Healthcommunities.com
Home Search SiteMap Forum Store Physician Board

FISH test relevance

Post a new topicby yang2828 on Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:56 pm

I had a tumor removed from my bladder 5 years ago. The procedure was followed by cystoscopy exam every 6 months. I also had ultrasound and CAT scans this past month. All results were free of cancer. My doctor always ordered FISH: fluorescence in situ hubridization at each check up. The recent one showed abnormal DNA patterns. The doctor wants to do a biopsy even though nothing was seen in cysto, CAT, and ultrasound exams.
Does anyone have experience with FISH? Is it a useful test?
Frank
Facebook Twitter
yang2828
 
Posts: 2 | Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: FISH test relevance

Post a new topicby DanH on Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:39 pm

What I found out about the fish test is that it detects bc cancer cell DNA only. It can detect just a few cells that can't be seen yet. It is a good early detection tool.
Dan
Facebook Twitter
DanH
 
Posts: 7 | Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:40 pm

cron